The lawyers
debated about the length and nature of the alleged incident. Her side called it
bestial brutality, his conceded that it was just a consensual affair. The
accused seemed innocent, head down, admitting guilt about adultery, not rape,
and when he looked at her, his eyes expressed hurt or dismay. He was described
as a hardworking white-collar employee who lived for his wife, kids and aged
parents, a mere mortal stumbling over wily seduction. Her lawyer described the abuse
that went on for hours, moved to the evidence, including each object and method
employed. The other side questioned her character. She looked like a victim
then, shriveled, defeated, confused. Her choice of clothing, leading to the
incident, was called inappropriate and suggestive. It was recorded that she was
not a virgin. Her experience in matters related to sex was impressed upon the
learned judge with the impassive face.
She looked up,
stared at his lawyer, bewildered, flinching at the conjectures about her sexual
life, her sad eyes turned to the accused, her lawyer, the clerks before the
judge and then to the judge.
She changed
then.
Her back
straightened, chest pushed out, her breasts heaving, the shawl slipping, her
legs parted slightly, in a wide stance, a hand on her hip, her ample curves
visible, the other hand toyed with a charm on a chain near her breast. His lawyer stopped the narration
when she smiled, a smile that lurked on her smirking lips and teasing eyes, the
eyes that seemed to have turned kohl-lined, dark and fearless. She stared at
the lawyer for a while. Then, her seductive gaze fell on everyone in the room, daring
people to speak. Her tongue flicked out to wet her pouting lips or suggestively
poked within at her dimpled cheek. The judge wiped his forehead. Her lawyer appeared
stunned. The accused kept his head down, fidgeting, nervous or scared.
No comments:
Post a Comment